Press Releases

Singapore Pools and Singapore Turf Club Found Suitable to be Exempt Operators under Remote Gambling Act

Published: 29 September 2016

Singapore Pools Private Limited (Pools) and Singapore Turf Club (STC) have been found suitable to be exempt operators under the Remote Gambling Act (RGA).  They will be allowed to offer remote gambling services for their existing products, under a stringent set of conditions.

 

Background

 

2.           The RGA came into force in February 2015.  The law takes a prohibitive stance against gambling.  It prohibits remote gambling activities and provides law enforcement agencies with the powers to tackle remote gambling and its associated concerns.  The RGA criminalises the entire spectrum of remote gambling activities, from individual gamblers to persons who facilitate or provide remote gambling services.  It also provides for a comprehensive set of blocking measures, namely website blocking, payment blocking and advertising bans.  This law is part of a multi-pronged strategy to deal with remote gambling.  Other components include stepping up enforcement and expanding public education and outreach.

 

3.           Since the RGA came into force, several hundred online gambling sites have been blocked.  MHA has also blocked bank accounts and credit card transactions linked to remote gambling payments.

 

Exempt Operator Regime

 

4.           While our blocking regime is one of the most comprehensive in the world, and significantly restricts and impedes access to remote gambling, it is not straightforward to eradicate remote gambling totally.  A complete ban would only serve to drive remote gambling underground, making it harder to detect, and exacerbate the associated law and order and social concerns.  The RGA therefore provides for a tightly-controlled exempt operator regime to mitigate these concerns.  This approach is not unique to Singapore.  Jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and Norway have adopted a similar approach and also allowed regulated authorised operators.

 

5.           Under the RGA, an exempt operator must be not-for-profit and be based in Singapore.  It must also contribute to public, social or charitable causes in Singapore.

 

Outcome of Applications

6.           STC and Pools submitted applications for exemption certificates in May and July respectively last year.  MHA has conducted thorough checks and assessment of the applications, and has found both suitable to be exempt operators.  The exemption is granted only for their existing products.  The exempt operators will not be allowed to offer casino-style games or poker.

 

7.           MHA has imposed stringent operating conditions on both entities.  They have to keep their management and operations of the remote gambling services free from criminal influence, ensure integrity of their operations and implement social safeguards and responsible gambling measures.

 

8.           Pools and STC will be issued exemption certificates when they launch their remote gambling services in the next two months. The certificates will be valid for a period of three years.

 

Conclusion

 

9.              A general prohibition against remote gambling is necessary.  However, a complete ban will drive remote gambling activities underground, and exacerbate law and order concerns.  A tightly-controlled exempt operator regime mitigates such concerns.  The stringent exempt operator regime is part of our multi-pronged strategy to deal with remote gambling, which includes comprehensive legislation, enforcement, blocking measures and public education. 

Topics

Gambling and Casino Regulation
Law and order